<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Friends&#8221; vs. Friends, Twitter vs. The Long Missive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeremyhatch.com/openfolio/friends-vs-friends-twitter-vs-the-long-missive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeremyhatch.com/openfolio/friends-vs-friends-twitter-vs-the-long-missive/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 17:11:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: garote</title>
		<link>http://jeremyhatch.com/openfolio/friends-vs-friends-twitter-vs-the-long-missive/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>garote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremyhatch.com/?p=1423#comment-186</guid>
		<description>Wow ... that linked essay is practically begging for a cookie, a blanket, and a reassuring pat on the head.

Frankly, if a hundred million people want to type and read public telegrams to each other on a massive scale (i.e. Twitter and Facebook), I&#039;ll consider that an improvement, since in ages past, they would probably be illiterate peasants.

But that begs the question, &quot;is Twittering destroying long conversation&quot;, with the answer, &quot;no, it&#039;s bootstrapping it.&quot;  William would rather answer the question &quot;yes&quot;, and pull the cultural fire alarm.

Personally, I find that the bigger threat to my &quot;capacity for intimacy&quot; is the number of hours I have to work.  For me, &quot;social networking&quot; is a tool for leveraging what little non-work time remains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8230; that linked essay is practically begging for a cookie, a blanket, and a reassuring pat on the head.</p>
<p>Frankly, if a hundred million people want to type and read public telegrams to each other on a massive scale (i.e. Twitter and Facebook), I&#8217;ll consider that an improvement, since in ages past, they would probably be illiterate peasants.</p>
<p>But that begs the question, &#8220;is Twittering destroying long conversation&#8221;, with the answer, &#8220;no, it&#8217;s bootstrapping it.&#8221;  William would rather answer the question &#8220;yes&#8221;, and pull the cultural fire alarm.</p>
<p>Personally, I find that the bigger threat to my &#8220;capacity for intimacy&#8221; is the number of hours I have to work.  For me, &#8220;social networking&#8221; is a tool for leveraging what little non-work time remains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

